The modus operandi of Differentiating
Homeopathic Medicines
by Measuring physiological
variability in Human Body temperature
-“Research work Ready for open Challenge”

-Dr.Devendra Kumar
Munta MD (Homeo)
Abstract:  Homeopathic Medicine of 200c potency are
given to Human subjects. Temperature variability is measured from skin of fore
arm.  Temperature variability data is
subjected to parametric reconstruction and Auto regressive spectrum with the
help of statistical software to identify the remedy specific action.  Autoregressive coefficient’s of different
remedies are compared with one another by using correlation coefficient
formula. Similar remedies taken their appropriate place in the correlation
chart.
Keywords:Biorhythm,
Physiological variability, Hypothalamus,Temperature Variability, data logger,
Water soil temperature sensor, Parametric Reconstruction and Prediction, AR
Spectrum, AR Spectral Coefficients, Correlation coefficient.
Aims and Objective:
Primary
Objective:
To differentiate Homeopathic remedies from
one another.
To identify an unlabelled Homeopathic
medicine i.e, given to a person
To select right Homeopathic remedy for a
diseased person.
Secondary
Objective:
To know the relation between Homeopathic Remedies.
To verify Homeopathic basic principles and
other observations made by stalwarts.
Introduction and Review of
Research works:
Homeopathic
medicines produce great impact on Hypothalamus, influence biorhythm this intern
effect the physiological phenomenon in human body which are the cause for
health and disease. Modern science called Homeopathic medicine as placebo due
to absence of substance in Homeopathic dilutions. Research work on
physiological variability is conducted to explore the possible mechanism under
the action of Homeopathic medicines. 
This research may further explain the complexes in Homeopathic dilutions
which might have a path for modern trends in Homeopathic Research.
The low concentrations of homeopathic remedies, often
lacking even a single molecule of the diluted substance,1 lead to an objection that has dogged
homeopathy since the 19th century: how, then, can the substance have any
effect? Modern advocates of homeopathy have suggested that “water has a
memory”—that during mixing and succussion, the substance leaves an
enduring effect on the water, perhaps a “vibration”, and this
produces an effect on the patient. However, nothing like water memory has ever
been found in chemistry or physics.2,3, Furthermore, the claims of homeopathy
contradict pharmacological science, which shows that higher doses of an active ingredient exert stronger
effects.
Homeopathic remedies have been the subject of numerous clinical trials, which test the
possibility that they may be effective through some mechanism unknown to
science. While some individual studies have positive results,4,5 systematic reviews of published trials
have failed to demonstrate efficacy.6,7,8,9 
What is dynamic influence,–dynamic power?10 Our
earth, by virtue of hidden invisible energy, carries the moon around her in
twenty eight days and several hours, and the moon alternately, in definite
fixed hours (deducting certain differences which occur with the full and new
moon) raises our northern seas to flood tide and again correspondingly lowers
them to ebb. Apparently this takes place not through material agencies, not
through mechanical mechanical contrivances, as are used for products of human
labor; and so we see numerous other events about us as results of the action of
one substance on another substance without being able to realise a sensible
connection between cause and effect. Only the cultured, practised in camparison
and deducation, can form for himself a kind of supra-sensual idea sufficient to
keep all that is mataerial or mechanical in his thoughts from such concepts. He
calls such effects dynamic, virtual, that is, such as result from absolute,
specific, pure energy and action of the one substance upon the other substance.10
Biases are present in placebo-controlled trials of both homoeopathy and
conventional medicine. When account was taken for these biases in the analysis,
there was weak evidence for a specific effect of homoeopathic remedies, but
strong evidence for specific effects of conventional interventions. This
finding is compatible with the notion that the clinical effects of homoeopathy
are placebo effects.11
Central council for research in Homeopathy conducted a research work on
physiological variability concluded results as such Aconitum napellus produced
a response in heart rate variability (HRV) with 30c potency and in blood flow
variability with 1M potency. Sulphur 200c and 1M, Gelsemium 200c and Pulsatilla 200c, produced a 62.5% response in HRV
against the placebo response of 16.6%. GelsemiumPhosphorus, and Sulphur produced a response in blood flow
variability with a 1M potency, similar to the response of Aconitum napellus 1M.These data suggest that it is
possible to record the response of homeopathic medicines on physiologic
parameters of the autonomic nervous system.12
Dr.Devendra Kumar MD(Homeo)
International Homeopathic Consultant at Ushahomeopathy
I am a Homeopathic Physician. I am practicing Homeopathy since 20 years. I treat all kinds of Chronic and Acute complaints with Homeopathic Medicines. Even Emergency conditions can be treated with Homeopathy if case is properly managed. know more about me and my research on my blog https://www.homeoresearch.com/about-me/
Dr.Devendra Kumar MD(Homeo) on EmailDr.Devendra Kumar MD(Homeo) on FacebookDr.Devendra Kumar MD(Homeo) on GoogleDr.Devendra Kumar MD(Homeo) on LinkedinDr.Devendra Kumar MD(Homeo) on RssDr.Devendra Kumar MD(Homeo) on TwitterDr.Devendra Kumar MD(Homeo) on Wordpress

1 Thought to “The modus operandi of Differentiating Homeopathic Medicines by Measuring physiological variability in Human Body temperature -“Research work Ready for open Challenge””

  1. Nice information .. thank you

    new follower. Would be happy if you visit me at MedProcedures

Comments are closed.